Factors associated with high compliance behaviour against COVID-19 in the early phase of pandemic: a cross-sectional study in 12 Asian countries

IntroductionRegardless of having effective vaccines against COVID-19, containment measures such as enhanced physical distancing and good practice of personal hygiene remain the mainstay of controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Countries across Asia have imposed these containment measures to varying extents. However, residents in different countries would have a differing degree of compliance to these containment measures potentially due to differences in the level of awareness and motivation in the early phase of pandemic.ObjectivesIn our study, we aimed to describe and correlate the level of knowledge and attitude with the level of compliance with personal hygiene and physical distancing practices among Asian countries in the early phase of pandemic.MethodsA multinational cross-sectional study was carried out using electronic surveys between May and June 2020 across 14 geographical areas. Subjects aged 21 years and above were invited to participate through social media, word of mouth and electronic mail.ResultsAmong the 2574 responses obtained, 762 (29.6%) participants were from East Asia and 1812 (70.4%) were from Southeast Asia (SEA). A greater proportion of participants from SEA will practise physical distancing as long as it takes (72.8% vs 60.6%). Having safe distancing practices such as standing more than 1 or 2 m apart (AdjOR 5.09 95% CI (1.08 to 24.01)) or more than 3 or 4 m apart (AdjOR 7.05 95% CI (1.32 to 37.67)), wearing a mask when they had influenza-like symptoms before the COVID-19 pandemic, preferring online news channels such as online news websites/applications (AdjOR 1.73 95% CI (1.21 to 2.49)) and social media (AdjOR 1.68 95% CI (1.13 to 2.50) as sources of obtaining information about COVID-19 and high psychological well-being (AdjOR 1.39 95% CI (1.04 to 1.87)) were independent factors associated with high compliance.ConclusionsWe found factors associated with high compliance behaviour against COVID-19 in the early phase of pandemic and it will be useful to consider them in risk assessment, communication and pandemic preparedness.

Association between well-being and compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures by healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study.

IMPORTANCE: Knowledge and attitude influence compliance and individuals' practices. The risk and protective factors associated with high compliance to these preventive measures are critical to enhancing pandemic preparedness. OBJECTIVE: This survey aims to assess differences in mental health, knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of preventive measures for COVID-19 amongst healthcare professionals (HCP) and non-healthcare professionals. DESIGN: Multi-national cross-sectional study was carried out using electronic surveys between May-June 2020. SETTING: Multi-national survey was distributed across 36 countries through social media, word-of-mouth, and electronic mail. PARTICIPANTS: Participants ≥21 years working in healthcare and non-healthcare related professions. MAIN OUTCOME: Risk factors determining the difference in KAP towards personal hygiene and social distancing measures during COVID-19 amongst HCP and non-HCP. RESULTS: HCP were significantly more knowledgeable on personal hygiene (AdjOR 1.45, 95% CI -1.14 to 1.83) and social distancing (AdjOR 1.31, 95% CI -1.06 to 1.61) compared to non-HCP. They were more likely to have a positive attitude towards personal hygiene and 1.5 times more willing to participate in the contact tracing app. There was high compliance towards personal hygiene and social distancing measures amongst HCP. HCP with high compliance were 1.8 times more likely to flourish and more likely to have a high sense of emotional (AdjOR 1.94, 95% CI (1.44 to 2.61), social (AdjOR 2.07, 95% CI -1.55 to 2.78), and psychological (AdjOR 2.13, 95% CI (1.59-2.85) well-being. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: While healthcare professionals were more knowledgeable, had more positive attitudes, their higher sense of total well-being was seen to be more critical to enhance compliance. Therefore, focusing on the well-being of the general population would help to enhance their compliance towards the preventive measures for COVID-19.

Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on irritable bowel syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Gastrointestinal manifestations of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may mimic irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and social distancing measures may affect IBS patients negatively. We aimed to study the impact of COVID-19 on respondents with self-reported IBS. METHODS: We conducted an anonymized survey from May to June 2020 in 33 countries. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices on personal hygiene and social distancing as well as psychological impact of COVID-19 were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences in well-being and compliance to social distancing measures between respondents with and without self-reported IBS. Factors associated with improvement or worsening of IBS symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 2704 respondents, 2024 (74.9%) did not have IBS, 305 (11.3%) had self-reported IBS, and 374 (13.8%) did not know what IBS was. Self-reported IBS respondents reported significantly worse emotional, social, and psychological well-being compared with non-IBS respondents and were less compliant to social distancing measures (28.2% vs 35.3%, P = 0.029); 61.6% reported no change, 26.6% reported improvement, and 11.8% reported worsening IBS symptoms. Higher proportion of respondents with no change in IBS symptoms were willing to practice social distancing indefinitely versus those who deteriorated (74.9% vs 51.4%, P = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, willingness to continue social distancing for another 2-3 weeks (vs longer period) was significantly associated with higher odds of worsening IBS. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that self-reported IBS respondents had worse well-being and compliance to social distancing measures than non-IBS respondents. Future research will focus on occupational stress and dietary changes during COVID-19 that may influence IBS.

Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: A population-based survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Functional gastrointestinal disorders are a group of stress-sensitive gut-brain disorders. The COVID-19 outbreak has caused immense stress and anxiety among the general public. Strict measures to counter COVID-19 emergency, including physical distancing, have also taken a toll on physical and mental health. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms of functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: An online survey was conducted in Japan for a group of randomly assigned panelists from May 26 to 27, 2020. Each respondent answered a questionnaire on stress, physical distancing, and worries about COVID-19. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed to diagnose FD and IBS (Rome III), and psychological symptoms were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. RESULTS: A total of 5157 subjects were finally enrolled, with FD in 8.5%, IBS in 16.6%, and FD-IBS overlap in 4.0%. For both gastrointestinal and psychological symptoms, respondents with FD-IBS overlap showed the worst scores, followed by IBS-alone, then FD-alone respondents. During the COVID-19 pandemic, 11.9% of respondents reported deterioration and 2.8% reported improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms. FD-IBS overlap, psychological disease comorbidity, and stress at work/school were significantly associated with symptom deterioration. Younger age, commuting by public transport, and work/study from home were associated with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected FD/IBS subjects, with respondents showing FD-IBS overlap syndrome as the most important independent factor associated with deterioration in gastrointestinal symptoms. Physicians need to take extra care of FD/IBS patients in the post-COVID period.

IDDF2020-ABS-0205 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on irritable bowel syndrome

IDDF2020-ABS-0205 Table 1Comparison of demographic variables between respondents with and without IBS Non-IBS (n = 2024) IBS (n = 305) p Age 39.7 ± 12.9 40.1 ± 13.0 1.0 Gender 0.6 Male 727 (35.9) 119 (39.0) Female 1297 (64.1) 186 (61.0) Race 0.2 Bengali 31 (1.5) 2 (0.7) Caucasian 24 (1.2) 6 (2.0) Chinese 1148 (56.7) 188 (61.6) Filipino 45 (2.2) 2 (0.7) Indian 154 (7.6) 20 (6.6) Japanese 5 (0.2) 0 (0.0) Korean 131 (6.5) 28 (9.2) Malay 328 (16.2) 39 (12.8) Others 158 (7.8) 20 (6.6) Economic region 0.3 High 1156 (57.1) 183 (60.0) Upper-middle 457 (22.6) 74 (24.3) Middle/Low 411 (20.3) 48 (15.7) What is your highest education level? 0.8 No formal education/Primary school 9 (0.4) 0 (0.0) Secondary school 164 (8.1) 29 (9.5) Pre-university 258 (12.7) 44 (14.4) Tertiary – undergraduate/postgraduate degree 1593 (78.7) 232 (76.1) Employment 0.4 Full-time 1497 (74.0) 213 (69.8) Part-time 125 (6.2) 18 (5.9) Not working 402 (19.9) 74 (24.3) Housing 1.0 Dormitory 61 (3.0) 13 (4.3) Government housing with 2 or 3 rooms 306 (15.1) 37 (12.1) Government housing with more than 3 rooms 376 (18.6) 62 (20.3) Private apartment or condominium 601 (29.7) 89 (29.2) Private landed property 680 (33.6) 104 (34.1) Annual household Income per capita in USD (total household income/number of people in the household) 1.0 Less than $1000 259 (12.8) 37 (12.1) $1000 - $2000 274 (13.5) 46 (15.1) $2000 - $4000 375 (18.5) 49 (16.1) $4000 - $6000 211 (10.4) 29 (9.5) $6000 - $8000 138 (6.8) 24 (7.9) $8000 - $10000 173 (8.5) 23 (7.5) More than $10000 594 (29.3) 97 (31.8) Have you been diagnosed with COVID-19? 1.0 Yes 32 (1.6) 4 (1.3) No 1992 (98.4) 301 (98.7) Compliance 0.029 Yes 715 (35.3) 86 (28.2) No 1309 (64.7) 219 (71.8) Not flourishing 1025 (50.6) 207 (67.9) <0.01 Flourishing 999 (49.4) 98 (32.1) Well-being total scores 45.8 ± 14.6 40.5 ± 14.8 <0.01 Emotional well-being 10.3 ± 3.5 9.4 ± 3.6 <0.01 Social well-being 15.0 ± 6.1 12.8 ± 6.1 <0.01 Psychological well-being 20.4 ± 6.6 18.3 ± 6.7 <0.01 Abstract IDDF2020-ABS-0205 Table 2Comparison of demographic variables between respondents who reported no change and worsening in severity of IBSQuestion No change (n = 183) Worsen (n = 35) p Age 38.8 ± 12.2 40.1 ± 14.3 1.0 Gender 1.0 Male 71 (38.8) 14 (40.0) Female 112 (61.2) 21 (60.0) Economic region 0.1 High 110 (60.1) 28 (80.0) Upper-middle 44 (24.0) 6 (17.1) Middle/Low 29 (15.8) 1 (2.9) What is your highest education level? 1.0 Secondary school 18 (9.8) 4 (11.4) Pre-university 22 (12.0) 5 (14.3) Tertiary – undergraduate/postgraduate degree 143 (78.1) 26 (74.3) Employment 0.2 Full-time 132 (72.1) 26 (74.3) Part-time 7 (3.8) 4 (11.4) Not working 44 (24.0) 5 (14.3) Work from home 1.0 Yes 45 (32.1) 8 (26.7) No 95 (67.9) 22 (73.3) Compliance 1.0 Yes 54 (29.5) 10 (28.6) No 129 (70.5) 25 (71.4) Which of the following would you consider as main reason for compliance with social distancing measures? 0.034 Fear of getting COVID 19 90 (49.2) 11 (31.4) Fear of family members getting COVID 19 86 (47.0) 19 (54.3) Fear of fines/punitive measures 7 (3.8) 5 (14.3) Would you willingly participate in the contact tracing app? 1.0 Yes 143 (78.1) 27 (77.1) No 40 (21.9) 8 (22.9) For how long are you willing to practice social distancing behaviour to keep yourself and others safe? 0.016 As long as it takes 137 (74.9) 18 (51.4) For another 2–3 weeks 4 (2.2) 4 (11.4) For another 1 month 12 (6.6) 6 (17.1) For another 3 months 14 (7.7) 5 (14.3) For another 6 months 13 (7.1) 1 (2.9) I want social distancing to stop now 3 (1.6) 1 (2.9) Flourishing <0.01 Yes 64 (35.0) 3 (8.6) No 119 (65.0) 32 (91.4) Well-being total scores 40.5 ± 15.0 35.4 ± 13.3 0.1 Emotional well-being 9.5 ± 3.5 7.7 ± 3.6 0.014 Social well-being 12.7 ± 6.3 11.7 ± 4.7 0.8 Psychological well-being 18.3 ± 6.9 15.9 ± 6.5 0.1 Abstract IDDF2020-ABS-0205 Table 3Univariable and multivariable regression of factors associated with worsening in severity of IBS (with no change in severity of IBS group as reference)Question OR (95% CI) p AdjOR(95%CI) p Do you wash your hands before and after handing food?* Never (ref) 1.00 - - Seldom 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - 50% of the time 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - Most of the time 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - Always 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - Do you cover your mouth when you sneeze or cough?* Never (ref) 1.00 - - Seldom 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - 50% of the time 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - Most of the time 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - Always 0.0 (0.0) 1.0 - - Which of the following would you consider as main reason for compliance with social distancing measures? Fear of getting COVID 19 (ref) 1.00 1.00 Fear of family members getting COVID 19 1.8 (0.8 – 4.0) 0.1 2.0 (0.9 – 4.7) 0.1 Fear of fines/punitive measures 5.8 (1.6 – 21.6) <0.01 5.9 (1.4 – 25.6) 0.017 For how long are you willing to practice social distancing behaviour to keep yourself and others safe? As long as it takes (ref) 1.00 1.00 For another 2–3 weeks 7.6 (1.7 – 33.1) <0.01 6.0 (1.2 – 28.8) 0.026 For another 1 month 3.8 (1.3 – 11.4) 0.017 2.9 (0.9 – 9.0) 0.1 For another 3 months 2.7 (0.9 – 8.4) 0.1 3.1 (0.9 – 10.2) 0.1 For another 6 months 0.6 (0.1 – 4.7) 0.6 0.6 (0.1 – 4.7) 0.6 I want social distancing to stop now 2.5 (0.3 – 25.7) 0.4 1.3 (0.1 – 22.3) 0.9 Emotional well-being 0.9 (0.8 – 1.0) <0.01 0.9 (0.8 – 1.0) 0.042 Flourishing was excluded from analysis due to overlap with emotional well-being.*Excluded from multivariable analysis due to 0 respondents in reference categories for respondents with no change in control IBSConclusionsOur study showed differences in well-being and compliance to social distancing between IBS and non-IBS respondents, and these factors influence the worsening in severity of IBS. Further research will focus on how occupational stress and dietary changes may influence IBS symptoms

The Practice of Gastrointestinal Motility Laboratory During COVID-19 Pandemic: Position Statements of the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association (ANMA-GML-COVID-19 Position Statements).

During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, practices of gastrointestinal procedures within the digestive tract require special precautions due to the risk of contraction of severe acute respiratoy syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Many procedures in the gastrointestinal motility laboratory may be considered moderate to high-risk for viral transmission. Healthcare staff working in gastrointestinal motility laboratories are frequently exposed to splashes, air droplets, mucus, or saliva during the procedures. Moreover, some are aerosol-generating and thus have a high risk of viral transmission. There are multiple guidelines on the practices of gastrointestinal endoscopy during this pandemic. However, such guidelines are still lacking and urgently needed for the practice of gastrointestinal motility laboratories. Hence, the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association had organized a group of gastrointestinal motility experts and infectious disease specialists to produce a position statement paper based-on current available evidence and consensus opinion with aims to provide a clear guidance on the practices of gastrointestinal motility laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. This guideline covers a wide range of topics on gastrointestinal motility activities from scheduling a motility test, the precautions at different steps of the procedure to disinfection for the safety and well-being of the patients and the healthcare workers. These practices may vary in different countries depending on the stages of the pandemic, local or institutional policy, and the availability of healthcare resources. This guideline is useful when the transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2 is high. It may change rapidly depending on the situation of the epidemic and when new evidence becomes available.